Posted on - Mar 25, 2013

By Catherine Sas Q.C.

Catherine Sas Q.C.

The topic of illegal workers has been featured prominently in the news recently with Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) in Vancouver conducting raids on several construction sites with television cameras in tow. This has drawn considerable media attention and has resulted in the BC Civil Liberties Association filing a formal complaint with the Privacy Commissioner against CBSA for filming migrant workers for a reality television series. Putting aside the concern about CBSA and television cameras, the real issue is about illegal workers. Nobody questions that working illegally is improper, but who is responsible for this? The worker, the employer, or both?

Regulation 196 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) clearly states,

“A foreign national must not work in Canada unless authorized to do so by a work permit or these Regulations.”

There are some situations in which a work permit is not required. Regulations provide for numerous exceptions to the need for a work permit such as coming to Canada as a business visitor, diplomat, foreign news correspondent, guest speaker, or professional athlete. However, in most situations a person will require a work permit in order to be lawfully permitted to work in Canada. Working illegally without a work permit can result in a person being issued an exclusion order for a period of one year or a deportation order which is a permanent bar to re-entry to Canada. In situations where a person leaves Canada prior to being discovered working illegally, an immigration officer is precluded from issuing another work permit for 6 months after the person has stopped the unauthorized work. The consequences of working illegally in Canada are severe, but what are the potential consequences to an employer for hiring an illegal worker?

Section 124(1)(c) states,

“Every person commits an offence who employs a foreign national in a capacity in which the foreign national is not authorized under this Act to be employed.”

The Act goes on to state that,

“A person who fails to exercise due diligence to determine whether employment is authorized under this Act is deemed to know that it is not authorized.”

There is however a due diligence defence to an employer who can establish that they took proactive steps to ensure that a worker was legally permitted to work. Employers have an obligation to ensure that the people they are employing are lawfully permitted to work in Canada. It is insufficient for an employer to say that they were unaware whether or not a person was in possession of a lawful work permit. Employers have a duty to ascertain the status of the people they employ and are required by law to exercise due diligence to ascertain the immigration status of their workers. In the event that employers are unable to establish that they have exercised due diligence, they are deemed to know that the worker is not lawfully permitted to work in Canada.

An employer found guilty of the offence of employing a person without a work permit is severe. An employer convicted of a summary offence is subject to a fine of up to $10,000 or 6 months in jail or both. An indictable conviction provides for a fine of up to $50,000 or imprisonment of up to 2 years or both.

The consequences for both employers and employees are significant when it comes to illegal foreign workers. The law is not on the side of employees to compel employers to let them work without work permits. Employers have the ultimate responsibility of ensuring that all of their employees are lawfully permitted to work in Canada.

Catherine Sas, Q.C. is a Vancouver immigration lawyer at Sas & Ing Immigration Law Centre in Vancouver, BC Canada. Catherine has been practicing law for over 25 years, and has been voted Vancouver’s Best Immigration Lawyer by the Georgia Straight newspaper for 6 consecutive years.

To learn more about immigrating to Canada, becoming a permanent Canadian resident or bringing your family to Canada, email Catherine Sas or call her at 1-604-689-5444.

Share this article:

Related Topics: , , , , ,

Related Posts

Express Entry is not Easy Entry – Understanding Canada’s New Immigrant Selection System On January 1, 2015 Canada's immigration program was dramatically and fundamentally changed. Overnight our immigration program morphed from an applicant driven model, to a government selection driven model. Up until December 31, 2014 an applicant could app...
Investor Immigration Program to be back in Business! The past few years have been tough ones for business persons seeking to access Canada's Business Immigration program. On July 1, 2011 the Entrepreneur category was suspended and on July 1, 2012 so was the Investor program. On February 11, 2014 the Governm...
Catherine Sas and Victor Ing to speak at IMEDA March 14 Catherine Sas and Victor Ing will be presenting "The Trump Effect: Turning to Canada's Immigration Program"
Immigration levels stay the course but workers to be sped up! Last week was full of announcements on the Immigration front for the Liberal government. On Monday, October 31, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship, Minister John McCallum, tabled his annual report to Parliament setting immigration levels f...
Canada’s temporary foreign worker program is broken – Ministers need to take action! If you are a business owner, odds are that one of the greatest challenges that you face is finding skilled and capable workers. Canada has experienced an ongoing shortage of workers in many sectors for over a decade and demographic projections indicate th...